of surveyed homes operated at a loss.
Up from 49% a year earlier. Nine months to March 2026.
StewartBrown · March 2026 ↗Up from 49% a year earlier. Nine months to March 2026.
StewartBrown · March 2026 ↗Down from a $0.91 surplus a year earlier. Mature-home results, excluding outliers; nine months to March 2026.
StewartBrown · March 2026 ↗Per bed day, before overhead allocation for costs. Nine months to March 2026 versus the prior year.
StewartBrown · March 2026 ↗Survey benchmarks, not a recoverable leakage rate. Whole-home losses include accommodation and everyday living. Wage and care-delivery changes also affect costs.
Three outcomes, tested together in the trial — for residents, for staff and for the balance sheet. Care requirements stay central to every option.
The right coverage and skills, with care requirements central to every option.
More workable rosters and less reliance on last-minute overtime.
Less validated avoidable spend. More value available for care.
Filling a shift means balancing care, people, employment rules and money at the same time. A change in one can change the cost and feasibility of all the others.
Resident needs and required care time shape coverage and the skills needed on each shift.
Availability, leave, fatigue and contracted hours determine whether internal cover is feasible.
Classifications, overtime, penalties and engagement conditions affect the full cost.
A sick call can mean an extension, a different worker or agency cover, each with different trade-offs.
Rosters, timesheets, payroll and agency invoices need to be reconciled to explain actual spend.
Compare feasible alternatives against the same care requirements, then track validated savings.
Residential nursing and personal-care staff, year to March 2023. Job departures, not necessarily sector exits. AIHW workforce survey ↗
Rosters, timesheets, payroll, agency invoices and availability each hold part of the answer. No single one shows which cost was avoidable, what a feasible alternative looked like, or how to stop the pattern repeating. Teams need all three, together, every roster period.
Help test the cash-leakage diagnostic and AI-assisted rostering tool with your team or an aged-care provider client. Three steps, one agreed roster period, real or synthetic data.
Use an agreed service or roster period and real or synthetic data to review potential avoidable spend with supporting records.
Evaluate feasible roster options against agreed care and employment rules. Test disruption scenarios such as sick calls.
Workforce and finance teams review findings, agree actions and track recurrence. Your feedback helps shape the launch.
Agency cover is booked. Was a qualified internal worker available at a lower fully costed rate? Only evidence of a feasible alternative supports a potential saving.
A short scoping conversation comes next. Together we agree data handling, scope, success measures and timing.
Your interest has been registered. We will be in touch about the next steps.
The trial tests these aims; savings are not guaranteed. Recovery means reducing avoidable future spend, not reclaiming valid wages or invoices. People approve decisions. No live roster is changed automatically.